Climate changes over time. There has always been and will always be climate change. As a geoscientist, I have listed the key drivers of climate change below for the reader’s reference. The details go into many academic terms, but those terms aren’t important for building the foundation. Please judge for yourself the relative importance of each factor.
- The heat emitted by the sun and its changes.
- Changes in the Earth’s orbit and the tilt of the Earth’s axis of rotation and its changes.
- Many geological factors and their effects on both the solar heat on the Earth’s surface and the heat distribution on Earth. These changes will affect the circulations of the ocean and atmosphere.
- Composition and stratification of Earth’s atmosphere. This includes the well-known greenhouse effect.
Climate change involves too many complicated physical, chemical, and biological processes, which are far from being understood fully by humans now. The biggest climate change on earth was the ice age. There have been at least five significant ice ages throughout the Earth’s history. The earliest ice age, the Huronian, was from 2.4-2.1 billion years ago and the latest Quaternary started 2.6 million years ago. Approximately a dozen major glaciations have occurred over the past 1 million years. The last glaciation ended about 12,000 years ago, and the earth is currently in an interglacial. At the current level of scientific development, none of us can truly understand the ice age and the cycles of glaciation. We cannot explain the causes of climate change during the cycles of past glaciation. It means that we are even more uncertain about the causes of modern climate change.
Globalists claim they can predict and change the climate in the future. Really? Many natural scientists, including me, have never believed in this anti-scientific rhetoric. We believe humans do not yet have the ability to predict or change the future climate. Someone may not think so, this is also normal. People can exchange opinions to promote scientific development. What is worrying is that someone does everything possible to disrupt academic exchanges and spread fear of the end of the world. What do they want?
The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established in 1988, and the propaganda of global warming entered the political realm. Then the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) issued a statement in 1992. It asked that the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere should be stabilized at a level based on their assumption. According to the 2016 Paris Agreement, until 2025, developed countries will provide developing countries with approximately US$100 billion in aid each year. The United States alone has to bear 75% of the annual expenses of the entire world, which is about 75 billion U.S. dollars per year. These agreements not only soared the financial burden of the United States but also imposed shackles on our economic development and energy independence. So, is there any reasonable basis for the agreements? Not at all. The only basis was their assumption that the earth is warming, and that human activities mainly caused this warming. Do you believe them?
When the public questioned their assumption, they declared their hypothesis had reached a scientific consensus. Really? The truth is, there have been many scientists who refute the assumption of man-made global warming. One example was a petition submitted to Congress in 2008 that was signed by over 31,478 American scientists, including 9,029 with Ph.D. Many of the signers currently work in different fields directly involved in the climate change controversy. The petition based on their review article with 132 references. The article ends with:” There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.” I fully agree with the above conclusion of their article. Besides, there are many similar scientific papers refuting the assumption of man-made global warming.
Those who threaten you with climate disasters boast they can predict and even change the future climate. This is the same as Mao’s revolutionary slogan of man can conquer the God. Really? In the minds of many natural scientists like me and my friends, we think this is absurd. Starting from the interglacial period that began 12,000 years ago, is the Earth’s climate warming or cooling? The scientific community has always had different views, but globalists only emphasized one. How much do human activities contribute to this change? The scientific community has always had different views, but they only emphasize one. They deliberately confuse local and short-term weather phenomena with long-term climate change. This is an insult to the intelligence quotient of the public, and its intention is very vicious.
Why does the IPCC continue to block scientific debates and remove uncertain scientific statements from the original report? Over the past few decades, why have they used financial tilt or even political means to strengthen their so-called consensus on disasters? Why do the CCP and the American radical left love this “consensus”? For a long time, there has always been someone playing political games behind the scenes. The IPCC, UNFCCC, and Paris Agreement provide a lot of false information to the public. They even said that if the entire world obeyed their orders, the “disaster” would disappear. Do they really have such amazing and super-scientific abilities? ……
The CCP virus has thrown the world into chaos for a year and more. People have no longer tolerate it. The lies about climate disasters have messed up the world for decades. Can you tolerate it anymore?
False propaganda about the climate emergency has misled the public for decades. Based on this absurdity, the current US government has launched a series of suicide policies in just 50 days. This includes the president’s executive orders, such as returning to the Paris Agreement and killing the energy independence of the United States and so on. Based on this absurdity, the US Congress is even legislating to declare a national climate emergency clearing the way for the Green New Deal. Based on this absurdity, the current US government is passing the initiative power destroying America into the hands of the enemy of human civilization……
Globalists have been exploiting people’s good will of preserving the natural environment to pursue various conspiracies in the name of science. Now all honest natural scientists must clarify the truth and work with the public to expose the true face of all pseudoscience. In the face of long-term disruption from these globalists, we have no time to wait any longer.
(03/10/2021)